Shame On Kansas: Kansas Bill Calls for HIV Positive People to be “Quarantined”

Legislators in Kansas are close to passing House Bill 2183, which has already passed in the state Senate, amends Kansas’ public-health regulations to allow for the isolation of people with “infectious diseases.” The bill could allow for those who are living with HIV or AIDS to be quarantined.

Kansas lawmakers have refused to add an exemption to the bill for people with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Healthcare Foundation director Michael Weinstein says “either shows how little they understand about HIV and how it is transmitted… or it shows that they want the ability to quarantine people, and/or discriminate against them in other ways as they see fit.

Weinstein says either rationale reveals “a real lack of understanding about public health and safety.”

The bill’s original intent was to aid EMT’s and firefighters in finding out whether someone they were exposed to on the job, is a carrier of an infectious disease. The bill in its current state, could allow for discrimination of HIV-positive Kansas residents.

Cody Patton, Executive Director of sexual health charity Positive Directions, said:

We live in a very conservative state and I’m afraid there are still many people, especially in rural Kansas, that have inadequate education and understanding concerning HIV/AIDS.

My fear would not be the state uses the law as some way to move all people living with HIV/AIDS into an isolated community, but that this law could allow some county employee to use this law to justify their religious beliefs over their professional responsibilities and discriminate against people with HIV/AIDS.

Lawmakers from both the House and Senate are joining together to get this law passed, meaning it will likely be voted on and passed in the next few weeks.

Here is a copy of the amended bill. The statute regarding HIV/AIDS begins on page two line 16.

Watch this video from KWCH, broadcast March 26, 2013

Leave A Comment ;)

comments

2 Readers Commented

Join discussion
  1. Danny Mouse on March 28, 2013

    It would be a shame if “[t]he bill in its current state, could allow for discrimination of HIV-positive Kansas residents.”

  2. c on March 28, 2013

    I’m not particularly concerned about this bill.

    Other far more progressive states have quarantine powers assigned to jurisdictional health officers. These powers involve court oversight and are used in circumstances when an individual is knowingly exposing others and will not cease despite order by the health officer.

    Is there opportunity for abuse particularly in rural communities where a judge might make a bad decision? Absolutely. There are checks though, and objections should be lodged against the proposed RULES ordered by this bill. You’ll note there is no legislative mandate to quarantine, merely to construct rules that protect both consumers AND providers.

HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY?